SKU: 1274627301

ITUAIS / TTAURILLON Compact Wallet-Blue Nuit (Dark Blue)

Sale price$12870.00 Regular price$14300.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

ITUAIS / TTAURILLON Compact Wallet-Blue Nuit (Dark Blue)ITUAIS ?para. viva. la. vida ()Rmy CarriatAnnonayBox Calf PalmelattoBox Calf PalmelattoColor: Blue Nuit Dark BlueSize:7. 0 10. 0 4. 0(cm)Taurillon Lagun Remy Carriat Box Calf Palmelatto : ANNONAYBox Calf Palmelatto

ITUAIS/イトゥアイスとは?

「para.viva.la.vida (美しき人生の為に)」をコンセプトに、ブランドの解釈による、情熱、楽しさを感じられるモノをスタイルにとらわれず表現していくレザーブランド。

主に財布、ブレスレットなどを革素材を使って展開しており、作られるアイテムや用途によって素材を選び、
最高級の革を探し求め製品化を目指している。

よって選び抜かれた素材はハイブランドやビッグメゾンが使用している素材と同等のものが使われており、
ブランドスタート直後でまだ知られていない知名度以外は全く引けを取らないハイクオリティな出来栄えとなっている。



手の平にすっぽり収まるサイズのコンパクトウォレット。

表には数多くのハイブランドに支持され、最高峰の革を作り出す事で有名なフランスのRémy Carriatの革『トリヨン』を使用。

柔らかで傷や擦れに強く、使い込むほどに馴染んでいく革です。
そして何より美しいシボ、鮮やかな発色は世界中の人々を虜にしています。


内側には同じくフランスのタンナー、Annonay社のBox Calf Palmelattoを贅沢に使用。
ボックスカーフは牛革の頂点に君臨するともいえる高級皮革で、滑らかでハリとコシのある質感、艶のあるエレガントな革です。
そのボックスカーフをキズの付きにくく仕上げたのがBox Calf Palmelatto。
財布を開いた時にまで気分が高まるよう、上質な革のみで仕上げられた非常にクオリティの高いウォレットです。

Color:Blue Nuit / Dark Blue
Size:縦7.0 ×横10.0 ×マチ4.0(cm)



Taurillon Lagun / トリヨンラグーン

財布の表側に使用している革。

 スペインにほど近いフランスの観光地エスプレット。香辛料で有名なこの街の中心部から徒歩圏内にRemy Carriat社があります。成牛やバッファローなど大判を得意とするこのタンナーはバッグ/財布/革小物/ソファ/家具/シューズなど幅広い用途で世界の名だたるスーパーブランドに革を供給しています。

外側に使用している革はトリヨンラグーンという雄牛のクロム鞣しの革で、傷擦れにも強く、使い込むほどに馴染む素材です。美しいシボ、鮮やかな発色、何より厚みのある革の独特な触り心地は手にした人にしかわからない存在感を醸し出す至高の革です。その高級感のある質感からバッグや財布との相性が良く、主に高級感にふさわしいアイテムに使用されています。また豊富なカラー展開が特徴となり、個性的なニュアンスカラーは発色の良いトレンド感のあるポップなカラーに仕上がり、反対にブラックやグレーなどは高級感のあるシックな印象となります。





Box Calf Palmelatto / ボックスカーフパルメラット

使用箇所:財布の内側

 フランス中南部に位置する、静かな町にあるANNONAY社。周囲を山に囲まれ、ミネラル豊富な水に恵まれています。その良質な源泉水を利用してなめされた高級皮革ボックスカーフは、滑らかであり、腰と張りのある革質となります。アノネイはフランスの原皮のみを利用して、ボックスカーフを生産するための設備を備えた専門のタンナーです。フランスの有名なメゾンや英国高級紳士靴などに供給しております。内側に使用している革はBox Calf Palmelattoというボックスカーフに傷が付きにくい仕上げとデザインの為の細か型押しが施している日本にはまだ馴染みのない素材ですが、ヨーロッパの有名な小物や鞄のブランドの為に作らせている非常に上品なボックスカーフです。
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 1274627301

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 213 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
R
Verified Purchase
Russell P. Hills
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
BEST BOOK IN 20 YEARS
Format: Hardcover
BEST BOOK that I have read in 20 years. This should be required reading in Christian schools. Every Christian who has graduated from high school should read this book. As one who has studied Church History, Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek myself, I had become very disappointed in what passes as scholarship, even among Ivy Leage graduates, in the 21st century. HOWEVER, Dr. Pitre's book is a great encouragement that there really are people "out-there" that display genuine scholarship. With Appreciation, Russ Hills, Ph.D.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
A
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
A Case for Jesus' Divine Self-Conception
Format: Kindle
This is a very meticulously reasoned argument attempting to show that Jesus had a Divine self-conception. That is, Jesus believed, and claimed, that he was God. Pitre begins by posing C.S. Lewis’ famous “trilemma” to the reader. If Jesus claimed to be God, we have three ways to respond – he was either a Liar, Lunatic, or Lord. Pitre’s work in this book strives to bring us back, face to face, with this trilemma. To accomplish this, Pitre needs to defeat another popular notion in the modern mind – that Jesus, or at least much of the Gospel material about him, was a “Legend.” If Pitre can show that Jesus did, in fact, historically claim Divinity, we will be forced to respond to his claim and answer Jesus’ own question for ourselves – “Who do you say that I am?” To accomplish this Pitre first attempts to show that the Gospels are historically reliable. He believes that, contrary to modern scholarly opinion, the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they have been attributed to (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), that they were intended to portray historically accurate biographical pictures of Jesus, and that they were written much more closely to the time of Jesus than liberal scholars assume (Pitre tentatively dates the synoptic Gospels all before the destruction of the Temple in AD 70). These three pieces of evidence – authorship, intent, and dating – all lead Pitre to the conclusion that the Gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus. After setting the stage by arguing for the accuracy of our sources, Pitre delves into the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and tries to show that although it is not always explicit (i.e. Jesus doesn’t say “I am God, worship Me.”) even the synoptics portray Jesus as claiming Divinity. Using evidence such as Jesus’ use of the titles “Son of Man” and “I Am,” prophesy from the book of Daniel, Jesus’ “stilling of the storm,” the transfiguration, the pronouncement of the forgiveness of the parlytic’s sins, the riddle about the Son of David being David’s “Lord,”, the crucifixion, and the resurrection, Pitre makes his case. In the end, he believes that not only do the Gospel authors portray Jesus as Divine, but that these claims came from Jesus himself. Thus we are led, full circle, back to the trilemma. We can call Jesus Liar, Lunatic, or Lord, but not, according to Pitre, a Legend. This was a really interesting read from a conservative scholar. His exegesis of many Gospel passages illuminate how the Hebrew Scriptures provide a much needed backdrop for understanding each story. The Gospels are much more nuanced than we might first think and oftentimes one saying or image may evoke whole passages or concepts from the Old Testament that would have been apparent to early Jewish readers. As Pitre argues, understanding the Jewish context of the synoptic authors helps in understanding their Christology. In the end, I agree with Pitre that the Gospels are generally more historically accurate than “mainstream” scholars give them credit for. I think it’s plausible that the Gospel titles reveal their true authors and that they were written fairly early after Jesus’ death (before the fall of Jerusalem). I also agree that the Synoptics may implicitly ascribe Divinity to Jesus – although I don’t think that is an open and shut case. If there were more explicit cases in the synoptic Gospels where Jesus claimed Divinity, it would help his case. It still seems to me the only explicit sayings we have come from the Gospel of John, which even Pitre doesn’t seem to argue is historically reliable (at least he doesn’t focus on this in the book). It’s probably outside the scope of this book, but I would have loved to see Pitre address the idea of Jesus as Apocalyptic Prophet. He interacts with several scholars who accept this notion (EP Sanders, Dale Allison, Bart Ehrman, John Meier) and it’s a viable option in the world of Historical Jesus scholarship. I think it’s a relevant topic in all discussions surrounding a Historical Jesus and can be a large factor in how one answers the question of Jesus’ identity. This study is worth reading regardless of your theological persuasion, and Pitre’s arguments deserve serious consideration.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2016
S
Verified Purchase
ShopWeez
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Relief for dry mouth without gum irritation
Big improvement for users with sensitive gums. These relieve dry mouth during the night almost as well as the regular tabs. Some complained about a residual gel left on the gums. 🙄Just wipe it off. It’s a small thing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Bronx Mike
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
An easy fix for dry mouth
Excellent for dry mouth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Discerning Buyer
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 1
This version doesn’t work
I used these 2 nights in a row. I was hoping Oracoat found a solution to the problem people like me have with the regular Xylimelts: irritation of gums. As others have noted the “sensitive” version doesn’t melt and the goo that remains can be difficult to remove. I didn’t have too much trouble after the first night. However, the second day after use, it was so hard to get the remains out, I wound up with a very sore spot from digging it out. I will toss the rest. It’s too bad this effort fizzled. I hope Oracoat will find a solution For sensitive mouths. In the b meantime, I will use the original for a few nights and then stop before repeating. The idea behind the original product is fantastic. Unfortunately this attempt to make it usable for people with sensitive mouths hasn’t worked. Please try again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2025

recommand products