Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
nup2216 em1 fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0192531250000 NUP2216 E M1 ueres Breitenma: 33 mm Gewicht: 2270 Gramm Herstellungsland: Auf Anfrage Innendurchmesser: 80 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 140,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "9000. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 33,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 33,00 E Increased Load Capacity ECLASS number 23 05 09 01 ECLASS2 number 23 05 09 01 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 2. 57
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0192531250000 NUP2216-E-M1 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 33 mm |
| Gewicht: 2270 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Auf Anfrage |
| Innendurchmesser: 80 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 140,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "9000.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 33,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 33,00 |
| E Increased Load Capacity |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 2.57 |
| Innenmaße: mm 80,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| M1 Solid Brass Cage, Two Piece, Roller Guided |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 221000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 244000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "3400.0000" |
| XL X-Life |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 1662 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Lightweight but questionable coverage
I traditionally used the Coola face lotion but had switched to the spray for my body so I figured I’d try the face spray. It doesn’t smell as bad as a lot of the reviews say it does. It also doesn’t really smell “tropical” for that matter, but it isn’t unpleasant. It sprays evenly and doesn’t feel heavy or greasy. My only complaint is I still got a little burnt. Full disclosure: I’m super fair and have to reapply every 30-60 minutes, even without getting wet. So maybe it’s not meant for people with as pale a complexion as me. Or I have to constantly reapply, or put the lotion underneath. But otherwise I really liked it and really like Coola products.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 14, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Must have for a hot summer!
My mom saw my aunt using it and was impressed, so she bought it for herself and my sister-in-law. They both love how gentle it feels on the skin and that it’s organic and effective.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 12, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Too smelly
I love the idea of a clear spray sunscreen but my daughter says it stings her eyes and the smell gives me an instant headache. I really wanna like this but it’s a no go for me
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Great for sensitive skin
This was great to take on vacation. I went to Cancun and used this on my face. Never got burned. I have super sensitive skin and this didn’t cause any reactions. I’m also sensitive to smells and I don’t notice anything with this product. Will purchase again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 6, 2025
★★★★★ 1
Buyer beware!
Awful! I sprayed my face with it and immediately felt my skin burning. I opened the bottle and noticed all that was in it was a yellowish fluid that smelled like straight rubbing alcohol. My face still has marks on it days later from whatever the substance was. I have used this brand before, and never experienced anything like this. The product was either years past expiration, or liquid was replaced with some kind of chemical.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2025