Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
2002-2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Direct-Fit Front Pipe Kit 107-0152BRExhaust Direct Fit Front Pipe Kit 107 0152 offers unparalleled quality and durability to keep your vehicle on the road. Crafted from premium stainless steel, these front pipes are meticulously engineered to seamlessly replace the factory component, meeting or exceeding original specifications. The Direct Fit design ensures a straightforward bolt on installation process. For your convenience, BRExhaust Direct Fit Front Pipe Kit 107 0152 includes all
BRExhaust Direct-Fit Front Pipe Kit 107-0152 offers unparalleled quality and durability to keep your vehicle on the road. Crafted from premium stainless steel, these front pipes are meticulously engineered to seamlessly replace the factory component, meeting or exceeding original specifications. The Direct-Fit design ensures a straightforward bolt-on installation process. For your convenience, BRExhaust Direct-Fit Front Pipe Kit 107-0152 includes all essential components, such as gaskets, clamps, and necessary hardware. With a strong dedication to upholding factory standards, these front pipes guarantee a hassle-free restoration of your vehicles exhaust system to its original form and function. This Direct-Fit Front Pipe Kit is designed to fit the 2002-2004 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0L. BRExhaust Direct-Fit Front Pipe Kit 107-0152 includes (4) Bolts, (2) 2-Bolt Gaskets, (4) Nuts and interchanges with OE parts MR529712, MR552274. BRExhaust Direct-Fit Front Pipe Kit 107-0152 features durable stainless steel construction and is covered by a 2 year warranty.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 574 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Field Goal MISSED
Color: Kentucky Wildcats, Style: Goal Post Chew Toy
Got ripped off on this one. I missed or they lied about this product IS MADE IN CHINA. The school logo washed off in water when I first received before giving to dog. Gave to dog and she took one sniff and one bite and walked away. After a week of laying with dog chews, I threw it away.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 16, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Subpar manufacturing
Color: Penn State Nittany Lions, Style: Goal Post Chew Toy
We bought one of these dog toys in Happy Valley and our dogs LOVED it. I purchased two on Amazon and am disappointed with the shipment. One toy was 1st quality. The second one was in packing that was stapled back together and what we found was the toy was subpar. There were sharp pieces left from the molding process. I’m not sure how this wasn’t caught in the manufacturing process.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Beware of tiny plastic pieces
Color: Alabama Crimson Tide, Style: Goal Post Chew Toy
My nephew (brother's dog) loved it so much he has almost tore it to shreds in almost half of a year span.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 18, 2025
★★★★★ 2
Plastic too HARD!
Color: Georgia Bulldogs, Style: Goal Post Chew Toy
Plastic is extremely hard. Too hard for my puppy as is could crack his teeth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 10, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Dog approved
Color: Michigan Wolverines, Style: Goal Post Chew Toy
Dogs love these! On our second one when the first one became a T. Go Blue!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2025